-
Archives
- December 2023
- May 2020
- May 2016
- March 2016
- December 2015
- June 2015
- February 2015
- August 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- December 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- February 2003
- November 1998
- June 1998
- May 1998
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: August 2003
how to interpret thoughts about psychoanalysis
freud = fraud jung = dung lacan can’t
Posted in psycho
Leave a comment
tom holt = york city
comic novelist tom holt tries hard but will never amount to anything.. i read one of his books.. i forget which (they do seem to have a certain sameness about them) it was mildly diverting with quite a steady rate … Continue reading
Posted in good
Tagged 1966 World Cup, Brazil, Douglas Adams, novelist, United Kingdom
Comments Off on tom holt = york city
you must remember this.
through no fault of my own, i saw a fair proportion of the film titanic on sunday night. belinda & kal had the telly on and though i was mostly reading ‘a heartbreaking work of staggering genius’ it was often … Continue reading
Posted in good
Comments Off on you must remember this.
forty two
After a few days of intensive effort I have the names and addresses of almost all the professional philosophers in Britain. Now I am wondering what to do with them. They will be used at least once… Over at New … Continue reading
call me fishmeal
Some months ago — never mind how long precisely — having little or no money in my purse and nothing to interest me in contempory fiction, i thought i would take up a one pound wordsworth classic edition of moby … Continue reading
Posted in good
Comments Off on call me fishmeal
read the fucking manual?
ooh, just got a nokia 7210.. my old phone was stolen from my tent at the big chill.. the joke’s on the feef cos it didn’t have the sim in it and it’s a shitty siemens c45 that i’ve spent … Continue reading
Posted in good
Tagged favourite wellington boot manufacturer, investment bank, less technology, mediocre investment bank, Microsoft Windows
Comments Off on read the fucking manual?
nostradamus!
thurs, 18th April 2003, 11:40pm just discovered that i can edit the time and dates on these postings so that they are dated into the future.. they get stored away where you can’t see them until the time i specified … Continue reading
Posted in good
Comments Off on nostradamus!